Dental Portfolio
Sunday, October 26, 2014
Practical #2: #14 MO preparation and #12 MOD restoration
#14 MO Preparation
The preparation was made using a 330 bur for the outline and a 244 bur to open the box. A green FenderWedge was placed in between 13 and 14 for damage protection.
Good Features:
Isthmus Width: CD0 condenser will just fit and CD1 will not
Proximal: Margins visually free of contact with a gingival floor depth clearance of .5mm
Pulpal Floor: Ideal 1.5-1.7mm depth
Axiopulpal line angle: Beveled
Features that need improvement:
- Cavosurface margins: slightly rough
- Occlusal: atypical outline form
- Axial Floor Depth: slightly shallow
#12 MOD Restoration-Composite
Good Features:
- Occlusal Anatomy: Major grooves, pits and marginal ridges stimulate normal anatomical functions
- Margins: No flash
- Proximal Contact: No shredding of floss and proximal contour mimics anatomical shape
- Surface Finish: Smooth and shiny
- Typodont is clean
Features that Need Improvement
- Occlusal Anatomy: Slightly undercontoured and marginal ridge is not even with 11
- Margins: Slight deficiency on mesial
- Contact: Slight variation
- Proximal: Slight overhang on mesial box
Image shows slight overhang on mesial proximal box while also demonstrating the smoothness of the overall preparation.
Operative Practicals #1: MOD preparation and DO restoration with amalgam
#12 MOD Preparation
The preparation was made using a 330 bur for the occlusal surface and a 244 bur for the proximal boxes. 1.9mm green FenderWedges were placed in the interproximal spaces.
Good features of the preparation:
- Isthmus Width: CD0 condenser fit and the CD1 did not
- Proximal: margins were free of contact from adjacent tooth and the gingival floor depth had a clearance of .5mm
- Pulpal Floor: appropriate depth of 1.5-1.7mm
- Axiopulpal line angle: rounded
- Adjacent tooth was not damaged
Features that need improvement:
- Occlusal: Slight overextension/overextension and an atypical outline
- Proximal Box: slightly acute/obtuse cavosurface margins
- Buccal and Lingual walls are parallel or have minimal divergence
Image shows broken contact with adjacent teeth
Image shows broken contact with adjacent teeth- Isthmus Width: CD0 condenser fit and the CD1 did not
- Proximal: margins were free of contact from adjacent tooth and the gingival floor depth had a clearance of .5mm
- Pulpal Floor: appropriate depth of 1.5-1.7mm
- Axiopulpal line angle: rounded
- Adjacent tooth was not damaged
Features that need improvement:
- Occlusal: Slight overextension/overextension and an atypical outline
- Proximal Box: slightly acute/obtuse cavosurface margins
- Buccal and Lingual walls are parallel or have minimal divergence
Image shows broken contact with adjacent teeth
#13 DO Restoration
A matrix band was used to create the restoration
The Good Features:
- Contact: Optimal and allows POH floss to pass with resistance
- No damage to adjacent teeth
- Typodont is clean
The Features that need improvement
- Margins: Moderate deficiency in DB, slight flash
- Proximal Contact: Contact is rough and contours are not continuous with existing tooth surfaces
- Surface Finish: Moderately rough, pitted and voids
- Contour: anatomy lacks definition and contour will cause high occlusion
Image shows bulky contact with adjacent tooth and not conforming to the structure of the tooth
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)