#12 MOD Preparation
The preparation was made using a 330 bur for the occlusal surface and a 244 bur for the proximal boxes. 1.9mm green FenderWedges were placed in the interproximal spaces.
Good features of the preparation:
- Isthmus Width: CD0 condenser fit and the CD1 did not
- Proximal: margins were free of contact from adjacent tooth and the gingival floor depth had a clearance of .5mm
- Pulpal Floor: appropriate depth of 1.5-1.7mm
- Axiopulpal line angle: rounded
- Adjacent tooth was not damaged
Features that need improvement:
- Occlusal: Slight overextension/overextension and an atypical outline
- Proximal Box: slightly acute/obtuse cavosurface margins
- Buccal and Lingual walls are parallel or have minimal divergence
Image shows broken contact with adjacent teeth
- Isthmus Width: CD0 condenser fit and the CD1 did not
- Proximal: margins were free of contact from adjacent tooth and the gingival floor depth had a clearance of .5mm
- Pulpal Floor: appropriate depth of 1.5-1.7mm
- Axiopulpal line angle: rounded
- Adjacent tooth was not damaged
Features that need improvement:
- Occlusal: Slight overextension/overextension and an atypical outline
- Proximal Box: slightly acute/obtuse cavosurface margins
- Buccal and Lingual walls are parallel or have minimal divergence
Image shows broken contact with adjacent teeth
#13 DO Restoration
A matrix band was used to create the restoration
The Good Features:
- Contact: Optimal and allows POH floss to pass with resistance
- No damage to adjacent teeth
- Typodont is clean
The Features that need improvement
- Margins: Moderate deficiency in DB, slight flash
- Proximal Contact: Contact is rough and contours are not continuous with existing tooth surfaces
- Surface Finish: Moderately rough, pitted and voids
- Contour: anatomy lacks definition and contour will cause high occlusion
Image shows bulky contact with adjacent tooth and not conforming to the structure of the tooth
No comments:
Post a Comment